<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Online Journalism: Why it&#8217;s the Place to Be</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bradkellett.com/p/on-online-journalism-why-its-the-place-to-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bradkellett.com/p/on-online-journalism-why-its-the-place-to-be/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:09:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdy</title>
		<link>http://bradkellett.com/p/on-online-journalism-why-its-the-place-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-7958</link>
		<dc:creator>mdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pantsland.com/2007/06/04/on-online-journalism-why-its-the-place-to-be/#comment-7958</guid>
		<description>I agree -- as long as we&#039;re dealing with time-sensitive information, online is the place to be. 

Not only is it faster to get the word out online, it&#039;s also much easier to communicate that information globally (hence my ability to comment on your blog even though I&#039;m in another country).  Printed material, in contrast, is constrained by the laws of matter and physics. 

Distribution costs also grow proportionately with the number of copies distributed for printed matter; that&#039;s not the case with online material. 

Another great advantage of the online medium -- the ability to link to a wealth of resources to add context to your piece, without infringing on anyone&#039;s copyright. 

Print does have its advantages, though. Aside from the portability, there&#039;s also the fact that, as an information consumer, I don&#039;t need to have internet access or electricity to benefit from print -- a fact I&#039;m not likely to forget anytime soon after last year&#039;s experience of having no electricity for 6 straight days after a super typhoon. ;-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8212; as long as we&#8217;re dealing with time-sensitive information, online is the place to be. </p>
<p>Not only is it faster to get the word out online, it&#8217;s also much easier to communicate that information globally (hence my ability to comment on your blog even though I&#8217;m in another country).  Printed material, in contrast, is constrained by the laws of matter and physics. </p>
<p>Distribution costs also grow proportionately with the number of copies distributed for printed matter; that&#8217;s not the case with online material. </p>
<p>Another great advantage of the online medium &#8212; the ability to link to a wealth of resources to add context to your piece, without infringing on anyone&#8217;s copyright. </p>
<p>Print does have its advantages, though. Aside from the portability, there&#8217;s also the fact that, as an information consumer, I don&#8217;t need to have internet access or electricity to benefit from print &#8212; a fact I&#8217;m not likely to forget anytime soon after last year&#8217;s experience of having no electricity for 6 straight days after a super typhoon. ;-P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna</title>
		<link>http://bradkellett.com/p/on-online-journalism-why-its-the-place-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-7957</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 05:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pantsland.com/2007/06/04/on-online-journalism-why-its-the-place-to-be/#comment-7957</guid>
		<description>this article is very informal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this article is very informal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
